Congress Tackles Clean Energy Tax Incentives

Posted by admin on 04/15/2010

Yesterday, the House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing to “examine the effectiveness of current energy tax policy.”  The focus of the hearing was on how the U.S. could contend with China and European countries that are racing ahead in the competition to build manufacturing capacity for clean energy industries, such as wind, solar, and batteries. Dr. Joseph Romm at the Center for American Progress testified that China is a leading manufacturer of photovoltaic cells, second only to Japan, and it was set to be the world’s leading manufacturer of wind turbines by the end of 2009.  He also highlighted a March study by the Pew Charitable Trusts, that found that China was outspending the U.S. in clean energy by $34.6 billion to $18.6 billion in 2009. Mr. Matt Rogers, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Energy, testified that the U.S. has a relatively small share of manufacturing capacity for clean energy goods:
“In 2008, the U.S. had 16% of global wind manufacturing capacity (5.4 gigawatts (GW) in the U.S. out of 33 GW worldwide), 6% of global solar manufacturing capacity (0.5 GW out of 9 GW worldwide), and less than 1% of global battery manufacturing capacity.”
Mr. Rogers and Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Michael Mundaca testified that progress is being made due to clean energy investments made in the Recovery Act, but that more funding would be needed to fully realize our potential for job creation. For example, the $2.3 billion in so-called 48c tax credits for investments in advanced energy manufacturing facilities are supporting 183 projects in 43 states.  However, the program was oversubscribed by a 3:1 ratio.  The President has proposed an additional $5 billion for 48c tax credits to support at least $15 billion in total capital investments. The risk of inaction was highlighted by Committee Chairman Sandy Levin:
“We have to make certain this demand is satisfied with goods produced in the U.S.  If we are not aggressive about expanding our green manufacturing capacity, these manufacturing jobs will be created overseas and the United States will become more reliant on products that are produced outside of our borders.”
Yet, while billions of dollars are being invested to create demand for clean energy manufactured goods, the Alliance for American Manufacturing believes that simply throwing money at the issue is not enough.  Strong domestic content requirements are needed to maximize job creation associated with incentives for clean energy production.  Americans have been frustrated to learn that our efforts have resulted in the creation of manufacturing jobs in China and elsewhere.
  • West Texas Wind Farm.  In October 2009, a consortium of American and Chinese companies announced a deal to build a $1.5 billion, 36,000-acre wind farm in west Texas, relying solely on imported Chinese turbines.  Company officials said they planned to collect $450 million in taxpayer support to subsidize the project that is estimated to create dozens of permanent jobs in the U.S. and thousands of manufacturing jobs in China.
  • BP solar.  In March 2010, BP announced the closure of its solar panel manufacturing facility in Frederick, MD.  It intends to shift production to China and India to gain access to cheap labor.  BP recently applied for taxpayer financial assistance for a proposed 32 megawatt solar-power generation plant on land belonging to the Energy Department's Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York.
Without properly designed tax and investment incentives for clean energy generation, loan guarantees for nuclear reactor construction, and other federal supports, our efforts to rejuvenate our manufacturing base could be unseated by subsidized imports from countries seeking to capitalize on new demand for clean energy products in the United States, such as wind turbines and solar panels. Congress should continue to enact and enforce strong domestic sourcing requirements for all federal infrastructure investments, including instances when taxpayer dollars are used to incentivize or support renewable energy production.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • The U.S. is competing without a manufacturing strategy, and the trade numbers show we’re getting our butts kicked. http://t.co/mtxfMmXMkq 10 hours 53 min ago
  • So much for that "rising star" thing. http://t.co/mtxfMmXMkq 11 hours 38 min ago
  • What made @papergirlmacy cry while working on the book Factory Man? @NewsHour has the answer: http://t.co/R56dMJNgeF 12 hours 34 min ago
  • Love this! College's new mobile manufacturing training lab provides on-demand training in advanced manufacturing: http://t.co/hGsSIwqgKa 13 hours 39 min ago
  • "We were going to compete, and remain an American manufacturer, and from that time on, we never looked back." http://t.co/3PuYpsFqT9 14 hours 24 min ago
  • More buzz for Factory Man, this time from @NewsHour. "It’s the largest employer in town. But it wasn’t & isn’t easy." http://t.co/3PuYpsFqT9 15 hours 16 min ago
  • @RossiMachServ How wonderful! We'd love that. 15 hours 18 min ago
  • The U.S. might be a "rising star" in manufacturing, but there's still a lot of work left: http://t.co/b6c8JbKyEX 1 day 8 hours ago
  • If the United States wants to maintain its "rising star" manufacturing status, it must do a few key things: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 1 day 11 hours ago
  • That's right: the U.S. is a "rising star" in manufacturing. But there's more to do to increase our competitiveness: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 1 day 12 hours ago