Manufacturing Jobs for the GOP?

Posted by jeckert on 08/27/2010

reagan2 AAM Senior Analyst Kerri Toloczko wrote an op-ed for Big Government on why the GOP needs to care about manufacturing jobs just as much as the Democrats do. Toloczko references AAM's popular poll to help prove her point:
"Conducted jointly by Republican pollster Whit Ayres and Democrat Mark Mellman, the results of the AAM survey are astounding.  It shows that across all party, geographic and demographic lines, Americans still believe in manufacturing despite its decade long decline, and associate it with a sound economy and a secure nation. "Given a choice of eight industries, respondents were asked which was most important to our economy.  Sixty-two percent of Republicans and 63% of Independents ranked manufacturing higher than “finance/banking” and “healthcare.” "In choosing which industry matters most to national security, manufacturing earned a plurality from Republicans (43%), Independents (40%) – higher than Democrats (38%). "Most surprising were results from participants who self-identified as active in the Tea Party movement or supporting it. "At 71%, the number of Tea Party supporters who had a favorable view of American manufacturing was higher than Democrats’.  Asked if they would back a national strategy using tax, labor and trade policies to support manufacturing, more than seventy percent of Independents, Republicans and Tea Partiers said “yes.”"
She adds:
"Calls for a liberal-style national manufacturing “policy” has long given free market Republicans justifiable fits.  But smart American manufacturing policies have existed since Alexander Hamilton, whose successful arguments for a domestic merchant fleet rather than reliance on France sowed the seed for today’s robust Merchant Marine and Coast Guard. "Even Ronald Reagan saw value in defending Harley Davidson and American semi-conductor businesses against market distorting practices by some U.S. competitors."
Read in full. ##

1 comment

Shane Block wrote 2 years 42 weeks ago

I agree that NAFTA is a big

I agree that NAFTA is a big problem, but the unions being part of the problem, I disagree with that bigtime. With Union membership declining for the past 30 to 40 yrs and companies (union and nonunion) continuing to slash jobs and move over seas so they can an extra penny on there stock even if the total loss to the company is greater , I would have to say that bad managerial decisions in these companies are the problem. And even when companies are tanking they still seem to give there managers and ceos huge payouts. I would have to say we need unions more now than we ever have. Just my opinion.

Hal Carter wrote 2 years 42 weeks ago

How can we reenergize our

How can we reenergize our manufacturing base? Via import Taxes? Look at Europe’s import taxes on US automobiles (26%). How do they get away with high import tariffs and we can’t? What caused the USA to lose jobs - NAFTA and Unions? Unions were essential in the 40s and 50s, and from the worker’s point of view, the only way to increase their standard of living. But, the Unions inflationary wages and benefit packages caused the price of goods to rise where it became disastrous on the nation’s economy. How can we change the Union’s inflationary practices and get these jobs and manufacturing back?

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter