Oinking Around
Posted by vriz on 04/28/2009
Well… it’s starting to happen: countries are banning U.S. pork because there are 64 confirmed human cases of swine flu in the U.S. Chinese authorities were quick to ban pork from the states where human cases of swine flu have showed up. Never mind, that there is no scientific evidence that there have been any cases of swine flu in the U.S. hog population. Never mind, that there is no scientific evidence that humans can get the flu from eating pork. Never mind, that the confirmed cases of the swine flu all related to travel to Mexico.
Reactionary policy responses that are not based on the scientific evidence are nothing more than grandstanding by some governments that come across as ham-fisted and misinformed.
Add a comment
Related recent Blogs
- June 18, 2013 Headlines: Free trade in DC, defending surveillance tactics, and more. • by LRaup • 06/18/2013
- Make the right choice for your pet -- buy American-made • by TGarland • 06/17/2013
- June 17, 2013 Headlines: Negotiation of a free trade deal, North Korea's proposition for the U.S., and more. • by LRaup • 06/17/2013
- June 14, 2013 Headline: France's trade agreement fears, thriving manufacturing plants, and more. • by LRaup • 06/14/2013
- June 14, 2013 Headline: France's trade agreement fears, thriving manufacturing plants, and more. • by LRaup • 06/14/2013
- June 13, 2013 Headlines: Bill Clinton's take on U.S. manufacturing, troubled trade agreements, and more. • by LRaup • 06/13/2013
- June 12, 2013 Headlines: The strain that surveillance has on trade deals, confidence in the job market, and more. • by LRaup • 06/12/2013
- CHICAGO TRIBUNE: Obama should honor campaign promise about China • by scapozzola • 06/10/2013
- Senator Sherrod Brown still has hope for pro-growth, jobs-focused trade policies • by LDonia • 06/10/2013
- June 10, 2013 Headlines: U.S.-China California summit, slow growth in the U.S. economy, and more. • by LRaup • 06/10/2013