Corporations Complain China Forced Train Technology Transfer
A guest post by AAM intern Whitney Stack:
Executives of international companies assisting with China’s massive high-speed rail project say that they were forced to transfer their technology in order to gain access to the Chinese market, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday. Journal reporter Shai Oster writes that “Foreig Executives of international companies assisting with China’s massive high-speed rail project say that they were forced to transfer their technology in order to gain access to the Chinese market, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday. Journal reporter Shai Oster writes that “Foreign executives and analysts have raised particular concerns about the technology transfers because they fear the transfers could help Chinese rivals develop as competitors.” China’s Ministry of Railways conducted a rare press conference to deny the executives’ claims, but this is yet another case in which manufacturers have said China demanded they give up proprietary information in order to get contracts. The Chinese government plans to invest $295 billion by 2020 in a project to build a high-speed rail network that will connect the country’s major cities. He Huawu, chief engineer at the Ministry of Railways, acknowledged at the news conference that China's trains are based on foreign technology, but he claimed they had been greatly modified by Chinese engineers. He said the technology transfer was not forced. Peter Navarro, author of the book, “The Coming China Wars,” wrote about the methods China uses to force technology transfer in the book, “Manufacturing a Better Future for America,” which was published with the assistance of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM). “One of the most potent weapons China has used to move up the value chain is forced technology transfer,” Navarro writes in the chapter, “Benchmarking Foreign Advantages.” “It is only through the acquisition (rather than internal development) of sophisticated technologies that Chinese companies have been able to rapidly enter and expand in sophisticated industries such as automobiles, aircraft, pharmaceuticals and other high-tech areas.” For example, Navarro writes, “China has very effectively used import licensing restrictions as a ‘bargaining chip’ to affect technology transfer from companies like General Motors and Ford when they are setting up production facilities in China with the intention of selling into the Chinese market.”
1 comment
Related recent Blogs
- May 24, 2013 Headlines: U.S.-EU trade deal exemptions, investing in U.S. manufacturing, and more. • by LRaup • 05/24/2013
- Washington State Bridge Collapse Illustrates Perils of Failing Infrastructure. • by scapozzola • 05/24/2013
- Reps. Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) and Michael Grimm (R-NY) form new Congressional Public Transportation Caucus. • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- Homeland Security and Gov. Tom Ridge • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- CNBC: Is a Chinese construction firm benefiting from its Beijing connection? • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- May 23, 2013 Headlines: Gains in the job market, small businesses manufacturing in the U.S.A., and more. • by LRaup • 05/23/2013
- VIDEO: Concerns about America's defense industrial base • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- CNBC: China investing in U.S. • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- In Indiana, ongoing concerns about subsidized auto parts from China and Japan • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- RADIO: AAM's Scott Paul on Leslie Marshall Radio Show, May 20, 2013 • by scapozzola • 05/21/2013
This is such totally old
This is such totally old news.
Boeing was forced, I believe, to send tail assembly work to China in return for contracts. That was probably 10 years ago. It doesn't matter how you guys publicize this, Washington has already given us up. Nice to have a resolution passed on manufacturing, but so what. It was just the House, and it makes nothing happen.
The absolute only way to save us now is a nation-wide wildcat strike for all manufacturing workers. They need to strike until the dollar goes way down, and it will go down because you need to cause real political instability. It will be risky, and what are workers to do without pay? I don't know, but it is the only way left.
Why doesn't AAM start floating this idea? Just set a start date, like Labor Day. Use your "new media" or whatever to pass the word, "all plants in the US on strike starting Labor Day until the dollar buys 50 yen, 4 yuan, and half-a-euro... That's 50... 4... 1/2..."