Will DoD adhere to Buy America requirements on shoes and underwear?
The Berry Amendment, a law established in 1941, directs the Defense Department to favor American-made textile products when equipping U.S. troops.
But as Kathleen Miller reports for Bloomberg News, the U.S. government has skirted some of these requirements in recent years.
Specifically, Miller reports that the U.S. Army provides recruits with cash allowances to buy sneakers and women’s underwear. The problem is that these cash vouchers can be used to purchase shoes and underwear that come from other countries, including China.
That may change soon, however, with the House of Representatives voting this month to require the Pentagon to give recruits American-made athletic shoes. The move was led by strong lobbying from domestic shoe manufacturer New Balance, with help from Rep. Mike Michaud (D-ME).
“It’s the law and it should be complied with, not circumvented,” said U.S. Representative Mike Michaud, a Maine Democrat who co-sponsored the measure and has New Balance factories in his state. “Purchases made by the U.S. government should benefit our domestic economy.”
Related recent Blogs
- What good's a trade agreement if you don't enforce the on-the-books trade rules? • by mmcmullan • 03/11/2014
- A National Manufacturing Strategy could be the "be all, end all" for depressed wages • by LRaup • 03/11/2014
- A Boy Scout badge in advanced manufacturing? • by TGarland • 03/10/2014
- Donald Trump addresses CPAC crowds on key AAM issues • by LRaup • 03/07/2014
- It wasn't all weather: What's behind the weak manufacturing jobs report. • by admin • 03/07/2014
- A Berry good story on American-made footwear • by mmcmullan • 03/06/2014
- White House economic adviser Gene Sperling shares words of wisdom on his way out • by TGarland • 03/05/2014
- EPI: Address currency manipulation and you address the jobs deficit • by mmcmullan • 03/05/2014
- A first look at the president's budget proposal for 2015 • by mmcmullan • 03/04/2014
- The U.S. needs a stronger domestic supply chain in the event of an attack • by TGarland • 03/04/2014