The State of Steel: Tougher trade rules and more infrastructure spending, say industry and labor leaders

Posted by mmcmullan on 03/25/2014

What’s the State of Steel? That question packed a room on Capitol Hill this morning, as the House of Representatives’ Congressional Steel Caucus invited executives and labor leaders to discuss the condition of the American steel industry.

The topics covered faced both inward and outward. ArcelorMittal USA CEO Mike Rippey kept most of his comments in-house and went big, saying that while oft-debated infrastructure investment might be pricey, it’s an investment now that will pay off later:

The American people are already paying a hidden tax for inadequate infrastructure in the form of the lost jobs, less personal safety, and a decreasing quality of life. Americans lose 4.2 billion working hours per year due to traffic tie-ups. Who wouldn’t pay an extra 5 or 10 cents a gallon if it meant they could spend an extra hour a day with their family?

And Mario Longhi, president and CEO of U.S. Steel, talked trade and expressed concern with a recent Department of Commerce ruling that let South Korean steelmakers off the hook for flooding the American market with impossibly cheap product:

Rule-breaking, Mr. Chairman, is cheating. And trade based on deception can never be “fair” trade.

After the hearing, the Alliance for American Manufacturing caught up with Leo Gerard, international president of the United Steelworkers. Below, Gerard explains that all stages of the steelmaking process should occur in the United States to be considered “American made.” Unfortunately, there are efforts to undermine the Buy America laws on the books by companies whose business model relies on importing foreign-made steel slab. But when we make slab in the United States and use it for domestic infrastructure projects, says Gerard, we support more U.S. workers:

All in all, an illuminating morning on Capitol Hill.  But we've only dipped a toe into the topics that today's hearing covered. Luckily, the good people at the American Iron and Steel Institute have gathered all of the testimony presented to the Caucus at their website. And read more about the specifics of the trade case Mr. Longhi mentioned right here.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • The U.S. is competing without a manufacturing strategy, and the trade numbers show we’re getting our butts kicked. http://t.co/mtxfMmXMkq 16 hours 47 min ago
  • So much for that "rising star" thing. http://t.co/mtxfMmXMkq 17 hours 32 min ago
  • What made @papergirlmacy cry while working on the book Factory Man? @NewsHour has the answer: http://t.co/R56dMJNgeF 18 hours 28 min ago
  • Love this! College's new mobile manufacturing training lab provides on-demand training in advanced manufacturing: http://t.co/hGsSIwqgKa 19 hours 33 min ago
  • "We were going to compete, and remain an American manufacturer, and from that time on, we never looked back." http://t.co/3PuYpsFqT9 20 hours 18 min ago
  • More buzz for Factory Man, this time from @NewsHour. "It’s the largest employer in town. But it wasn’t & isn’t easy." http://t.co/3PuYpsFqT9 21 hours 10 min ago
  • @RossiMachServ How wonderful! We'd love that. 21 hours 12 min ago
  • The U.S. might be a "rising star" in manufacturing, but there's still a lot of work left: http://t.co/b6c8JbKyEX 1 day 14 hours ago
  • If the United States wants to maintain its "rising star" manufacturing status, it must do a few key things: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 1 day 17 hours ago
  • That's right: the U.S. is a "rising star" in manufacturing. But there's more to do to increase our competitiveness: http://t.co/yVBTFyywYF 1 day 18 hours ago