Mitt Romney wants reciprocity with China when it comes to government procurement.

Posted by scapozzola on 04/19/2012

The United States government is a leading signatory to the World Trade Organization (WTO) “Government Procurement Agreement” (GPA).  The GPA ensures that participating nations can compete on an equal footing and share reciprocal access to government contracts. Many industrialized nations are signatories to the GPA.  However, China has not signed the agreement.

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney says that it's unfair for the U.S. government to open its contracts to Chinese manufacturers when Beijing is unwilling to do the same in return.  He has explicitly stated on his campaign website that if he were president, he would "discontinue U.S. government procurement from China until China commits to GPA."

Romney's strong words on market access aren't confined to his campaign website.  In the Wall Street Journal's "China Real Time Report," correspondent Bob Davis said that Romney has promised his administration would be "ordering the U.S. government not to buy Chinese goods and services."

Romney made a similar point in an op-ed in the Oct. 13, 2011 Washington Post that called for reciprocity in government procurement.  In laying out his approach to trade with China, Romney cited some serious ongoing problems:

  • That China "favors and subsidizes domestic producers over foreign competitors";
  • That when American companies "try to do business in the Chinese market, they find policies designed to shut them out";

In response, Romney offered two blunt proposals:

  • He would begin "by designating China as the currency manipulator it is;"
  • He would insist on "reciprocity in government procurement."

This is tough campaign talk, and it's unclear if Romney is simply telling voters what they want to hear, according to recent national polling.  Or, it may be that the former Massachusetts governor is genuinely committed to strengthening the hand of America's manufacturers.

1 comment

Anonymous wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

Won't get "reciprocity" anyway.

How about discontinuing gov't procurement from China unilaterally, without any consideration of the mythical "reciprocity"?

Simple: The government shouldn't be officially trading with our enemy.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • Toxic fast food meat is just another example of the dangers of Made-in-China goods: 38 min 14 sec ago
  • A #MadeinAmerica @TervisTumbler will keep your drink cold during the hot summer months: 5 hours 34 min ago
  • .@SecretaryFoxx & 11 former transportation secretaries urge Congress to pass a long-term transportation funding bill: 6 hours 10 min ago
  • We agree with @SecretaryFoxx: We need a long-term transportation infrastructure spending plan. Will Congress listen? 23 hours 46 min ago
  • .@SecretaryFoxx says long-term transportation plan needed. Doing so (w/ Buy America policies) will create jobs: 1 day 59 min ago
  • .@SecretaryFoxx says US transportation system "crumbling" in speech calling for a long-term spending plan: 1 day 1 hour ago
  • In @PressClubDC speech, @SecretaryFoxx calls for a long-term transportation spending plan instead of short-term fixes to Highway Trust Fund. 1 day 1 hour ago
  • 9 fun facts abt NY’s bridges, @Buzzfeed! Wouldn't it be great if a No. 10 told us they were all Made in the USA? 1 day 1 hour ago
  • .@Politico poll: Economy voters' top worry. To boost economy & create jobs, we shld rebuild our infrastructure w/ Buy America requirements. 1 day 2 hours ago
  • No. 1 issue for voters is economy, @Politico poll finds. Voters also call manufacturing jobs a top economic concern: 1 day 2 hours ago