Mitt Romney wants reciprocity with China when it comes to government procurement.

Posted by scapozzola on 04/19/2012

The United States government is a leading signatory to the World Trade Organization (WTO) “Government Procurement Agreement” (GPA).  The GPA ensures that participating nations can compete on an equal footing and share reciprocal access to government contracts. Many industrialized nations are signatories to the GPA.  However, China has not signed the agreement.

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney says that it's unfair for the U.S. government to open its contracts to Chinese manufacturers when Beijing is unwilling to do the same in return.  He has explicitly stated on his campaign website that if he were president, he would "discontinue U.S. government procurement from China until China commits to GPA."

Romney's strong words on market access aren't confined to his campaign website.  In the Wall Street Journal's "China Real Time Report," correspondent Bob Davis said that Romney has promised his administration would be "ordering the U.S. government not to buy Chinese goods and services."

Romney made a similar point in an op-ed in the Oct. 13, 2011 Washington Post that called for reciprocity in government procurement.  In laying out his approach to trade with China, Romney cited some serious ongoing problems:

  • That China "favors and subsidizes domestic producers over foreign competitors";
  • That when American companies "try to do business in the Chinese market, they find policies designed to shut them out";

In response, Romney offered two blunt proposals:

  • He would begin "by designating China as the currency manipulator it is;"
  • He would insist on "reciprocity in government procurement."

This is tough campaign talk, and it's unclear if Romney is simply telling voters what they want to hear, according to recent national polling.  Or, it may be that the former Massachusetts governor is genuinely committed to strengthening the hand of America's manufacturers.

1 comment

Anonymous wrote 2 years 17 weeks ago

Won't get "reciprocity" anyway.

How about discontinuing gov't procurement from China unilaterally, without any consideration of the mythical "reciprocity"?

Simple: The government shouldn't be officially trading with our enemy.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • The U.S. might be a "rising star" in manufacturing, but there's still a lot of work left: 12 hours 47 min ago
  • If the United States wants to maintain its "rising star" manufacturing status, it must do a few key things: 15 hours 55 min ago
  • That's right: the U.S. is a "rising star" in manufacturing. But there's more to do to increase our competitiveness: 17 hours 11 min ago
  • .@BCGPerspectives says the United States is among the "rising stars" in global manufacturing. Here's our take: 17 hours 55 min ago
  • Great @AP Q&A w/ @papergirlmacy on Factory Man: "When I write about economics, I write from the ground up." 18 hours 40 min ago
  • RT @RachelBSAAM: If you're attending the #NCSLSummit stop by booth 940 for a one of a kind @KeepitMadeinUSA root beer opener.… 19 hours 7 min ago
  • "China is among several economies whose manufacturing price advantage over the U.S. is eroding..." 19 hours 14 min ago
  • But we also hear Titan Gilroy will be grand marshal at the MAVTV 500 IndyCar World Championship next weekend! 19 hours 21 min ago
  • Titan Gilroy is bringing the #MadeinAmerica message to @MAVTV this fall: 19 hours 21 min ago
  • Back to School Shopping? Be sure to check out our #MadeinYourCity Back to School Guide: 1 day 16 hours ago