Mitt Romney wants reciprocity with China when it comes to government procurement.

Posted by scapozzola on 04/19/2012

The United States government is a leading signatory to the World Trade Organization (WTO) “Government Procurement Agreement” (GPA).  The GPA ensures that participating nations can compete on an equal footing and share reciprocal access to government contracts. Many industrialized nations are signatories to the GPA.  However, China has not signed the agreement.

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney says that it's unfair for the U.S. government to open its contracts to Chinese manufacturers when Beijing is unwilling to do the same in return.  He has explicitly stated on his campaign website that if he were president, he would "discontinue U.S. government procurement from China until China commits to GPA."

Romney's strong words on market access aren't confined to his campaign website.  In the Wall Street Journal's "China Real Time Report," correspondent Bob Davis said that Romney has promised his administration would be "ordering the U.S. government not to buy Chinese goods and services."

Romney made a similar point in an op-ed in the Oct. 13, 2011 Washington Post that called for reciprocity in government procurement.  In laying out his approach to trade with China, Romney cited some serious ongoing problems:

  • That China "favors and subsidizes domestic producers over foreign competitors";
  • That when American companies "try to do business in the Chinese market, they find policies designed to shut them out";

In response, Romney offered two blunt proposals:

  • He would begin "by designating China as the currency manipulator it is;"
  • He would insist on "reciprocity in government procurement."

This is tough campaign talk, and it's unclear if Romney is simply telling voters what they want to hear, according to recent national polling.  Or, it may be that the former Massachusetts governor is genuinely committed to strengthening the hand of America's manufacturers.

1 comment

Anonymous wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Won't get "reciprocity" anyway.

How about discontinuing gov't procurement from China unilaterally, without any consideration of the mythical "reciprocity"?

Simple: The government shouldn't be officially trading with our enemy.

Related recent Blogs

@KeepitMadeinUSA on Twitter

  • MT @ScottPaulAAM Don't cheer 2Q GDP estimate yet: imports rose faster than exports, an unnecessary drag on growth. 1 hour 38 min ago
  • Missed the news last night? Here's a recap of the status of the legislation to keep the Highway Trust Fund solvent: 2 hours 46 min ago
  • ICYMI: Senate passed its version of Highway Trust Fund bill; shortened length of extension to Dec. instead of May 2015. Heads back to House. 15 hours 5 min ago
  • The Senate is now debating legislation to reauthorize the Highway Trust Fund (well, until May 2015). Watch on @cspan: 18 hours 57 min ago
  • RT @SteveRattner: Amazing shift in US jobs -- gone from making things to taking care of sick people 19 hours 53 min ago
  • We must be close to election season. Candidates are talking a big game about unfair trade on the campaign trail: 22 hours 18 min ago
  • Looks like @amazon is getting into the 3D printing business. 23 hours 40 min ago
  • RT @WisconsinOven: MT @KeepitMadeinUSA @ScottPaulAAM shares ideas in @HuffingtonPost on how to restore American manufacturing leadership:ht… 1 day 25 min ago
  • BTW, ALL the machines at that Indianapolis Adidas plant helped produce LeBron jerseys. Plus more in Iowa & Cleveland. 1 day 25 min ago
  • !!! RT @darrenrovell The LeBron jersey assembly line at Adidas facility in Indianapolis 1 day 28 min ago