It's Time for Obama and Clinton to Step up to the Plate on China
Every day, America sends the equivalent of $700 million to China. That's the toll of our imbalanced trade relationship with the "butchers of Beijing." We send our manufacturing jobs, consumer dollars, and technological know-how to China. In return, we receive low-cost, under-inspected, and, all too often, unsafe consumer products. China uses its $256 billion annual trade surplus with the U.S. to fund weapons programs aimed at challenging U.S. military supremacy in the Pacific, build a new electronic "Great Firewall" to limit free speech and dissent, and crush Tibetans who seek to preserve their culture and religion. A small portion of that low, low price you pay at the big box store for a DVD player or pair of pants makes its way back to the communist regime's coffers, which now are filled with more than $1.4 trillion in foreign currency.
The recent crackdown in Tibet shows just how wrong those pundits and politicians really are who claimed that trade will open China. As a Senate candidate in 2000, Hillary Clinton supported granting China permanent, unconditional access to the U.S. market, citing its potential for opening China to greater rights. Senator McCain voted for the bill, which was championed by President Bill Clinton. Even former Senator John Edwards got snookered on this one. Senator Obama claims he would have voted against this bill; only seven Senate Democrats actually did.
Never have so many Senators (83 voted for it!) been so wrong. No one can plausibly make the argument that democracy and human rights are improving in China. No one can credibly make the case that our commercial relations with China have benefited. China is the largest unsolved international economic question of our time. So what can be done now?
We can start by lowering our trade deficit with China. China should stop manipulating its currency to gain a trade advantage. It should stop subsidizing its industries to give them an unfair advantage. And the administration can start enforcing our own trade laws which safeguard American workers, consumers, and businesses against this market-distorting behavior. China mocks our cowardice. But China would not risk access to our market if America were willing to make such access conditional on an end to cheating.
In upcoming primary states like Pennsylvania, Indiana, and North Carolina, this issue is critical. The job losses are mounting. Pennsylvania has shed 78,000 jobs due to our trade deficit with China; 45,000 have been lost in Indiana, and 77,000 in North Carolina. Let's hope that our candidates get the message.
This blog is cross-posted on The Huffington Post.
Related recent Blogs
- CNBC: Is a Chinese construction firm benefiting from its Beijing connection? • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- May 23, 2013 Headlines: Gains in the job market, small businesses manufacturing in the U.S.A., and more. • by LRaup • 05/23/2013
- VIDEO: Concerns about America's defense industrial base • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- CNBC: China investing in U.S. • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- In Indiana, ongoing concerns about subsidized auto parts from China and Japan • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- RADIO: AAM's Scott Paul on Leslie Marshall Radio Show, May 20, 2013 • by scapozzola • 05/21/2013
- May 21, 2013 Headlines: Tensions with North Korea, a stronger WTO, and more. • by LRaup • 05/21/2013
- Shoring up our security means addressing the China challenge • by mmcmullan • 05/20/2013
- Quote of the Day from Caterpillar's Doug Oberhelman • by LDonia • 05/20/2013
- May 20, 2013 Headlines: Manufacturing & social media, growth of the U.S. economy, and more. • by LRaup • 05/20/2013