GUEST OPINION: Why Doesn't the Wall Street Journal Really Speak for "Free Trade"?
Posted by scapozzola on 09/28/2010
A guest column, from Michelle Galanter Applebaum, Lecturer-Economics and Business, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, IL... The Wall Street Journal says it "speaks for free markets and free people [and] . . .for free trade," but betrays those very principles by attacking every person or entity which dares to speak out against China's blatant intervention in free markets and trade as in the paper’s September 15, 2010 editorial, "Obama's Outsourced Trade Policy." While the Journal does explicitly acknowledge that China "does offer a lot of support to its green-tech industry," which "probably runs afoul of its WTO obligations," nevertheless the paper continues to bash the administration and anyone else who tries to do something about this. By attacking the green-energy complaint we believe that the Journal continues to work hard to force-feed the notion that trade enforcement is simply union-pandering. By doing so the paper is trying to politicize an economic issue that threatens the very heart of the domestic economy's attempts to restore some semblance of normal growth. It’s inconceivable to us that the Wall Street Journal can continue to claim to be an advocate of free markets and free people and free trade while supporting China's blatantly mercantilist policies by attacking every individual or entity which protests against them as "protectionist." Rather than continuing to follow the simplistic approach of labeling anyone seeking a level playing field as a protectionist, the Journal should be re-examining the difference between free trade and the predatory mercantile beggar-thy-neighbor economic warfare that's been a big part of the fuel firing the Chinese economic miracle. Even the normally ever-so-diplomatic and behind-closed-doors Japanese, were quoted in the WSJ last week saying "foreign companies have faced problems in China that are unthinkable in a normal business environment." This is NOT about politics, this is about our economic future.
Related recent Blogs
- May 21, 2013 Headlines: Tensions with North Korea, a stronger WTO, and more. • by LRaup • 05/21/2013
- May 20, 2013 Headlines: Manufacturing & social media, growth of the U.S. economy, and more. • by LRaup • 05/20/2013
- May 17, 2013 Headlines: Strengthening our national security, focusing on jobs, and more. • by LRaup • 05/17/2013
- National Retail Federation dismisses global safety plan for garment factories while Cambodian shoe factory collapses. • by LDonia • 05/16/2013
- May 15, 2013 Headlines: U.S. manufacturing slows, while manufacturers discuss domestic production, and more... • by LDonia • 05/15/2013
- May 14, 2013 Headlines: Redefining success, building Amtrak, banning Tesla, and more... • by LDonia • 05/14/2013
- May 10 2013 Headlines: Obama's focus on manufacturing, U.S.-South Korea summit, and more. • by LRaup • 05/10/2013
- May 8, 2013 Headlines: U.S.-China cyber-spying, April job openings, and more. • by LRaup • 05/08/2013
- May 7, 2013 Headlines: GM denies, Obama blames, Safety Advocates scrutinze, and more... • by LDonia • 05/07/2013
- May 3, 2013 Headlines: Manufacturing jobs unchanged in April, re-thinking cheap clothing, and more... • by LDonia • 05/03/2013