Beijing has more words for U.S. debt negotiations. But does their opinion matter?
Reuters reports that China is continuing to press the United States "to take 'responsible' measures to boost market confidence in the dollar and U.S. government debt." Beijing's messages come as some investors worry that Washington could default on its debt.
Here's the interesting part, though: Who exactly asked Beijing for their opinion on the matter?
China cleverly, and self-servingly, has been continually undervaluing its currency to boost exports to the U.S. This stategy has worked, as evidenced by America's vast and rising trade debt with Beijing.
As Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) Executive Director Scott Paul explained last week, however, China desperately needs the U.S. as its key export market. This means Beijing has little choice but to sit on the sidelines while Washington hammers out a budget deal:
It’s true that China holds about $1.1 trillion in U.S. securities, which is roughly equal to 12 percent of the US public debt. That makes China a significant investor in US debt, but by no means our only creditor.
Does China have leverage as “our banker?” Not really. Default would do far more harm to China, which holds a total of $3.2 trillion in foreign currency reserves, than it would to the U.S. The simple truth is that China needs the U.S. more than we need China. There is still considerable domestic and global demand for U.S. debt as a safe haven, so we really don’t need China’s banking services, but China has no substitute for the American consumer market. China depends on the U.S. for a sizable portion of its manufacturing employment, shipping about one-third of its export goods to our market.
Paul is exactly right. Beijing needs the U.S. market, and can do little more than hem and haw as budget negotiations continue.
Read Paul's full column, "Does China Deserve a Seat at the Debt Ceiling Talks?"
2 comments
Related recent Blogs
- RADIO: AAM's Scott Paul on Leslie Marshall Radio Show, May 20, 2013 • by scapozzola • 05/21/2013
- May 21, 2013 Headlines: Tensions with North Korea, a stronger WTO, and more. • by LRaup • 05/21/2013
- Shoring up our security means addressing the China challenge • by mmcmullan • 05/20/2013
- Quote of the Day from Caterpillar's Doug Oberhelman • by LDonia • 05/20/2013
- May 20, 2013 Headlines: Manufacturing & social media, growth of the U.S. economy, and more. • by LRaup • 05/20/2013
- President Obama visits Baltimore factory to promote infrastructure investment as a means of revitalizing the middle class • by LDonia • 05/17/2013
- May 17, 2013 Headlines: Strengthening our national security, focusing on jobs, and more. • by LRaup • 05/17/2013
- Five reasons you should be concerned about the U.S. military's reliance on foreign manufacturers. • by LDonia • 05/16/2013
- Looking for a manufacturing job? Consider heading to one of these ten metro areas! • by mmcmullan • 05/16/2013
- National Retail Federation dismisses global safety plan for garment factories while Cambodian shoe factory collapses. • by LDonia • 05/16/2013
China would have no influence
China would have no influence even if the US weren't its largest export market (some argue it isn't if you decide the European Union, which appears to be falling apart, is a single "national" market).
See Michael Pettis' blog on this issue. China should have known that its US assets would decrease in value.
There is one way for China to see it assets increase in value, in three easy steps:
1. Stop buying US debt immediately.
2. Open up your market to US exports
3. Invest in green field US factories in industries such as shipbuilding, cellphones and others.
The US will then re-industrialize and the value of all US assets, including homes, commercial real estate, and yes, China's government bonds, will increase in value as the US economy booms.
If they didn't manipulate
If they didn't manipulate their currency and keep it cheap, they wouldn't have to buy all of those treasury bill.