Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) to Treasury Secretary Geithner: "Don't pat China on the back"
Earlier this week, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said that China has made “very significant” and “promising” progress on reducing trade surpluses and currency manipulation.
In response, Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) Executive Director Scott Paul sent a letter to Secretary Geithner, expressing disappointment for such unwarranted comments. Paul said that praising Beijing "does little more than give the Chinese government a blank check to continue its predatory assault on our economy":
For years China has intervened massively in foreign exchange markets, buying $1 billion a day to keep the dollar strong and its own currency weak to gain an artificial trade advantage. The result of this continued intervention in the currency markets has been a dampened recovery and massive job loss for American manufacturing. According to research by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), 2.8 million net jobs were lost over the last decade due to our massive and growing trade deficit with China.
Related recent Blogs
- May 24, 2013 Headlines: U.S.-EU trade deal exemptions, investing in U.S. manufacturing, and more. • by LRaup • 05/24/2013
- Washington State Bridge Collapse Illustrates Perils of Failing Infrastructure. • by scapozzola • 05/24/2013
- Reps. Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) and Michael Grimm (R-NY) form new Congressional Public Transportation Caucus. • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- Homeland Security and Gov. Tom Ridge • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- CNBC: Is a Chinese construction firm benefiting from its Beijing connection? • by scapozzola • 05/23/2013
- VIDEO: Concerns about America's defense industrial base • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- CNBC: China investing in U.S. • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- In Indiana, ongoing concerns about subsidized auto parts from China and Japan • by scapozzola • 05/22/2013
- RADIO: AAM's Scott Paul on Leslie Marshall Radio Show, May 20, 2013 • by scapozzola • 05/21/2013
- Shoring up our security means addressing the China challenge • by mmcmullan • 05/20/2013